The Trump Administration announced on January 11, 2018 that it is changing the structure of Medicaid by allowing states to establish work requirements for Medicaid enrollees. Work requirements are based on and perpetuate the myth that individuals enrolled in Medicaid coverage are unemployed and unmotivated to work. Many of the arguments underlying work requirements are designed to stoke racial resentment about entitlement programs, particularly playing upon harmful stereotypes of women of color. In reality, most individuals qualified for Medicaid are working if they are able, which means work requirements would not actually increase employment among Medicaid enrollees. Instead, work requirements would endanger individuals’ health and economic security in many cases, with a particularly harsh impact on women.

Work requirements are a radical change to the Medicaid program.

Work requirements are unprecedented in Medicaid.

At its core, Medicaid exists to provide health coverage to low-income people who cannot otherwise afford it, which helps these individuals attain or retain the capacity for independence and self-care. A work requirement goes against these objectives – it would allow a state to define what it means for an individual to be working, and then to deny Medicaid coverage to certain adults that do not meet that definition. The specifics of the requirement can vary depending on the proposal, but typically include a limited set of work activities undertaken for a specific period of time.

The idea of a work requirement is unprecedented in Medicaid. The Medicaid statute does not condition receipt of Medicaid benefits on any qualifications beyond those in the statute that serve to show an individual is someone who is in need of assistance obtaining health care coverage and services. Indeed, as recently as 2016 the Department of Health and Human Services rejected attempts by states to add work requirements through the Medicaid state waiver process because they were determined to be inconsistent with the purpose of the Medicaid statute.

Despite this, Trump Administration has Administration has decided to allow states to impose work requirements on individuals otherwise qualified for the Medicaid program.

Work requirements are based on a false premise and do not respect the realities of individuals’ lives.

Most nonelderly, adult Medicaid enrollees already work.

The idea that Medicaid enrollees need an incentive to work – Medicaid coverage – or should be punished if they don’t work – through loss of coverage – is based on the false narrative that Medicaid enrollees do not work and are taking advantage of the program’s benefits. This is a distortion of reality predicated on over-invoked racialized stereotypes of beneficiaries that ignores the lived experiences of all low-income people across racial lines. In fact, most Medicaid enrollees who can work, do work. The Kaiser Family Foundation found that:

  • Nearly 8 in 10 nonelderly adults enrolled in Medicaid in 2015 live in working families
  • Six in 10 nonelderly Medicaid adults are working themselves
  • Most working Medicaid enrollees work full-time for the entire year
  • Most of the nonelderly Medicaid enrollees who were not working reported significant barriers to employment. The main reasons reported for not working were:
    • Illness or disability, 35%
    • Taking care of home or family, 28%
    •  In school, 18%
    • Looking for work, 8%
    • Retired, 8%

These statistics show the truth about families that rely on Medicaid coverage: most have at least one working adult in the family. Furthermore, non-working adults are not working for reasons that most people readily understand as often not compatible with work, like fulfilling family caregiving responsibilities, pursuing an education, or an illness or disability.


Work requirements will harm – not help – individuals.

A Medicaid work requirement won’t help people find long-term employment or escape poverty.

Other social safety net programs have implemented work requirements over the last 20 years, but these work requirements have yet to demonstrate success at moving impoverished individuals out of poverty. In fact many families were worse off after work requirements were implemented. There is no reason to think Medicaid work requirements would achieve success where others have not.

TANF program work requirements are often used as a model for adding work requirements to Medicaid. Yet, research on the impact of work requirements in TANF found that:

  • TANF work requirements made no difference in long-term employment rates. Over five years, employment among cash assistance recipients not subject to a work requirement was the same or higher than among recipients subject to the requirement.
  • The large majority of individuals subject to work requirements remained poor, and some became poorer. In particular, the share of families living in deep poverty—below half of the poverty line—increased in states with work requirements.

A Medicaid work requirement would impair individuals’ health and ability to work.

Medicaid can help individuals deal with the health problems that are a barrier to employment by providing access to preventive care, treatment for health problems before they become more serious, and assistance managing chronic conditions. After Ohio expanded Medicaid coverage under the Affordable Care Act, its Medicaid Department found that three-quarters of the adults who received coverage who were looking for work reported that Medicaid made it easier to do so, and more than half of those who were working said that Medicaid made it easier for them to keep their jobs.

Denying Medicaid coverage for failure to meet work requirements will have the opposite result, forcing some individuals to choose between risking their own health or family’s wellbeing by working or risking their health by going without health insurance and needed medical care. Without insurance coverage, individuals’ health will worsen, making it even more difficult for them to find and retain employment.

Women are especially likely to lose health care coverage under a Medicaid work requirement, threatening their health and economic security.

Women are more likely to face barriers to employment.

The majority of adult Medicaid enrollees are women, and more than 6 in 10 of the nonelderly Medicaid enrollees who were not working in 2015 were women. The low-income women who are eligible for Medicaid are more likely than men to face particular barriers to employment. Women are more likely than men to be the sole or primary caregivers of children, to be caregivers for aging parents and other family members, and to work in low-wage jobs that don’t accommodate caregiving responsibilities. Medicaid work requirements limit the set of activities that count as work in ways that discount or ignore women’s unpaid, caregiving work and disproportionately affect women’s ability to remain enrolled in Medicaid. Furthermore, the required number of work hours may be unattainable, even for Medicaid enrollees with regular work, if they are balancing other responsibilities like childcare or if they are engaged in involuntary part-time work.

Women also have slightly higher rates of disability than men. Work requirements will pose particular harm to them; studies of the implementation of TANF work requirements found that TANF recipients who were sanctioned for not meeting work requirements have significantly higher rates of disability than those not sanctioned.

And the very factors that make it more difficult for individuals to meet a work requirement— caregiving responsibilities and a lack of child care, lack of transportation, or other limitations—make it more difficult for them to prove why they cannot meet a work requirement. And yet at the same time, low-wage women workers, who are more likely to be balancing part-time work and caregiving responsibilities, could have to deal with eligibility determinations more often, increasing the chances of gaps in coverage and inability to access the care they need.

Losing Medicaid coverage threatens women’s health and economic security.

All of these factors leave low-income women at particular risk of losing critical health coverage if work requirements are imposed, which would threaten women’s health and lives. Uninsured low-income women are more likely to go without care because of cost, are less likely to have a regular source of care, and utilize preventive services at lower rates than low-income women with health insurance. A growing body of research has demonstrated how important Medicaid coverage is to enrollees’ access to care, overall health and mortality rates. Among all sources of coverage, Medicaid disproportionately covers the poorest and sickest population of women.

At the same time, Medicaid has played a critically important role in advancing women’s economic security. It keeps women and their families from medical debt and bankruptcy. By providing health coverage to women and their families that is not tied to employment, Medicaid allows women to seek positions that may offer higher wages or better opportunities, and it also has improved the economic security of future generations. Medicaid’s coverage of birth control allows women to determine whether and when to start a family, expanding their educational and career opportunities. And Medicaid payments to health care providers directly support women’s jobs. Imposing work requirements would jeopardize these gains, putting the financial wellbeing of women and families on the line.