Abortion rights, women of color, and LGBTQIA+ people are under attack. Pledge to join us in fighting for gender justice.

On April 11th, families woke to the news that the Trump administration planned to completely eliminate the Head Start program as part of its forthcoming budget proposal to congress.1 Across the country, Head Start Programs, families, and entire communities worked diligently to uplift the value of the program and advocate to protect it. Weeks later, the Trump administration’s budget proposal to congress did not include the elimination of Head Start – an important win for families and advocates. Attempts to dismantle Head Start are not expected to cease, and perhaps equally important, they are not new or sporadic. Attacks on the Head Start Program, which includes Early Head Start and Migrant and Seasonal Head Start, are part of a decades-long sustained strategy to undermine progress for families with low incomes and reduce critical supports for entire communities.
The following timeline details the deliberate and sustained attacks on the Head Start Program in the first four months of the second Trump administration, which have led to instability, lack of access to funding, and even some programs temporarily closing their doors.2 These attacks can be traced directly to plans put forth by the Heritage Foundation in the conservative Playbook Project 2025, which proposed to fully eliminate the Head Start Program.3
Head Start began in 1965 as an anti-poverty program as part of President Lyndon Johnson’s War on Poverty efforts. Head Start programs have served millions of children and families for 60 years, including almost 800,000 in the last year alone4 through critical services like early childhood education, services during pregnancy, indoor and outdoor physical activity, social and emotional support, nutrition education along with meals and snacks, mental health services, health and dental screenings, financial literary classes, family engagement opportunities, help finding child care, or employment, transportation services, and providing a career path for many parents who become Head Start staff.
Timeline of Targeted Attacks on Head Start in 2025
January – FEDERAL FUNDING FREEZE
February – ACF FIRINGS BEGIN
March – HEAD START GRANTEES INSTRUCTED TO REMOVE DEI INITIATIVES
April – ACF FIRINGS CONTINUE, HEAD START REGIONAL OFFICE CLOSURES
TRUMP BUDGET PROPOSES ELIMINATING HEAD START
May – TRUMP BUDGET DOES NOT LIST ELIMINATING HEAD START; PROPOSES ELIMINATING OTHE EARLY CHILDHOOD PROGRAMS
In April, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed a lawsuit17 with a coalition of parent advocacy groups and State Head Start Associations challenging the Trump administration’s unlawful efforts to dismantle the Head Start program, stating that by slashing staff, delaying funding, and imposing bans that block programs from fulfilling their mission to support young children from low-income families, the administration is defying Congress’s mandate to continue Head Start services nationwide.18This lawsuit will be critical in determining what the Trump Administration can require programs to do to receive funding, particularly in light of HHS Secretary Kennedy’s Congressional testimony on May 14th stating that Head Start funding will preserved but that “in exchange, Head Start needs to be consistent with Administration priorities.“19
Despite Head Start’s proven record of success, conservative think tanks and leaders have been attempting to discredit and eliminate the program for decades.20 The first few months of the Trump Administration’s efforts show a clear and deliberate plan to consistently attack Head Start through any available means. Attacks on Head Start threaten the availability of child care and early learning programs, particularly for rural communities21; reduce employment and support for entire communities that are employed or partner with Head Start grantees; and seek to dismantle efforts to lift families out of poverty. These efforts are also a direct attack on democracy, as the Trump administration pursues illegal efforts circumventing Congressional authority and imposing requirements outside of and directly conflicting with Head Start statute.22