Site Branding
Click to toggle navigation menu. Menu
  • How We Work
  • About
    • Overview
    • Our Impact
    • Jobs at NWLC
    • Staff
    • Financials
    • Contact
  • Legal Help
    • Overview
    • Legal Help for Sex Discrimination and Harassment
    • Legal Help for Abortion Patients and Supporters
    • Abortion Provider Legal Help
    • Birth Control & Preventive Services Coverage
  • News and Commentary
    • News
    • Press Releases
    • NWLC In The Press
  • Take Action
    • Take Action
    • Partner With Us
    • Find Resources
  • Ways to Give
    • Ways to Give
    • Partner With Us
    • Donor FAQs
    • Gala
Donate
  • Abortion
  • Child Care
  • Equal Pay & the Wage Gap
  • General Health Care & Coverage
  • Poverty & Income Security
  • Supreme Court
  • Title IX
  • All Topics
    • Child Care & Early Learning
      • Child Care & Early Learning Access & Affordability
      • Child Care & Early Learning Policy Implementation
      • Child Care & Early Learning Workforce
    • Education & Title IX
      • Sexual Harassment in Schools
      • Pregnant & Parenting Students
      • Athletics
    • Health Care & Reproductive Rights
      • Abortion
      • Birth Control
      • General Health Care & Coverage
      • Refusals of Care & Discrimination
    • In the States
    • Judges
      • Judicial Nominations
      • Supreme Court
    • LGBTQ Equality
    • Litigation
    • Poverty & Income Security
      • Taxes
      • Income Supports
      • Housing
      • Data On Poverty & Income
    • Workplace Justice
      • Equal Pay & the Wage Gap
      • Sexual Harassment in the Workplace
      • Pregnancy, Parenting & the Workplace
Supporter Shop Newsletter Signup
Donate
  • Become a Monthly Changemaker
  • Ways to Give
  • Partner with Us
  • Support Our Gala
  • Donor FAQs
  • How We Work
  • About
    • Overview
    • Our Impact
    • Jobs at NWLC
    • Staff
    • Financials
    • Contact
  • Legal Help
    • Overview
    • Legal Help for Sex Discrimination and Harassment
    • Legal Help for Abortion Patients and Supporters
    • Abortion Provider Legal Help
    • Birth Control & Preventive Services Coverage
  • News and Commentary
    • News
    • Press Releases
    • NWLC In The Press
  • Take Action
    • Take Action
    • Partner With Us
    • Find Resources
  • Ways to Give
    • Ways to Give
    • Partner With Us
    • Donor FAQs
    • Gala

All Topics

  • Child Care & Early Learning
    • Child Care & Early Learning Access & Affordability
    • Child Care & Early Learning Policy Implementation
    • Child Care & Early Learning Workforce
  • Education & Title IX
    • Sexual Harassment in Schools
    • Pregnant & Parenting Students
    • Athletics
  • In the States
  • Health Care & Reproductive Rights
    • Abortion
    • Birth Control
    • General Health Care & Coverage
    • Refusals of Care & Discrimination
  • Judges
    • Judicial Nominations
    • Supreme Court
  • LGBTQ Equality
  • Litigation
  • Poverty & Income Security
    • Taxes
    • Income Supports
    • Housing
    • Data on Poverty & Income
  • Workplace Justice
    • Job Quality
    • Equal Pay & the Wage Gap
    • Sexual Harassment in the Workplace
    • Pregnancy, Parenting & the Workplace
Donate
Donate
  • Become a Monthly Changemaker
  • Ways to Give
  • Partner with Us
  • Support Our Gala
  • Donor FAQs
Search button
Supporter Shop
subscribe button

All Topics

Doe v. Catholic Relief Services

January 12, 2026

Issues:   LGBTQ Equality, Workplace Justice

Download Files
  • Doe v. CRS
On January 9, 2026, NWLC, along with our pro bono partner Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP and 14 additional organizations committed to gender justice, filed an amicus brief before the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in support of plaintiff-appellee John Doe in the case of Doe v. Catholic Relief Services(“CRS”). In this case, CRS, a religious employer, initially provided healthcare benefits to a gay employee’s spouse, but then terminated employer health insurance coverage for Mr. Doe’s husband based on a religious objection to marriage equality. Mr. Doe won a positive judgment at trial finding that CRS’s discrimination was illegal, and his employer appealed, claiming it is entitled to discriminate.

 

Before the Fourth Circuit, CRS advanced harmful arguments that enforcement of key federal laws prohibiting discrimination in employment (here, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Pay Act of 1963) burdens its free exercise of religion as an employer. Our amicus brief explains why Title VII, the EPA, and Maryland’s state equal pay law (MFEPA) are all religiously neutral and generally applicable, and therefore apply equally to all employers to fulfill their purpose of combating employment discrimination. If the Fourth Circuit rules for CRS, it would diverge from the clear weight of precedent on this issue and create a novel test for nondiscrimination cases involving religious employers. This outcome would, in turn, subject marginalized workers like LGBTQI+ workers, women, and Black and brown workers to greater risk of discrimination in the Fourth Circuit and throughout the US. Read the full brief here.

  • Press Room
  • Contact
  • Legal Help
  • Jobs
  • Phone: (202) 588 5180
bsky facebook instagram tiktok Linkedin

© 2026 National Women's Law Center

  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer